California Businesses For Sale, Opportunities, Franchises, Opportunity Sales - BizBen.com California Businesses For Sale Since 1994! The Best Way To Buy Or Sell A California Business!

   


Posted on October 20, 2009

Contributed by Chuck Post

Due Diligence: Buyers Role When Buying A Small Business


What is the extent of the Buyers obligation to investigate a business before purchasing it? To what extent should a Buyer rely on the Selling Broker for “decision making” information?  A “Common Sense “ approach to buying a business should tell you that certain areas need to be investigated before completing any business acquisition. So why is it that so many people find out so much about the business they purchased after the closing of the escrow?

The Buyers diligence begins upon the early stages of developing the idea to begin a business. The Buyer needs to start by thinking out how deep his or her commitment to the business will be. Is the Business Model conducive to your life style? It is extremely important to be realistic, fully aware and prepared for the commitment of a new business. Regardless, if the business is easy to operate, like a Coin Laundry or more complex and time consuming, like a restaurant. An acquisition of a business requires independent thinking and a willingness to seek expert help and guidance, when lacking. While Business Ownership offers a sense of freedom like nothing else can, without proper preparation this dream can turn into a nightmare; and always, unnecessarily.

As for the purchasing of the business; does the Buyer possess the skills necessary to assess and evaluate the business? Doe he or she have a good understanding of the potential of the market place, knowledge of the age, efficiency, current nature of, and condition of equipment and fixtures,  marketability of the inventory and, of course the lease terms are critical to understand.. These are big questions and require investigation; along with the more obvious, books, taxes and receipts. Does the Buyer have a clear picture of the improvements that need to be made to advance the business? No one wants to buy a business that can’t be improved. Typically, a new owner will want to make improvements. So, an understanding of the improvements that need to be made, along with a realistic estimate of their costs and the anticipated Net Effect; in terms of the Return on Investment, for these improvements need to be understood long before the lifting of contingencies or earlier.

It has been my experience that most Buyers anticipate that the Sellers Broker is on their team. This might very well be true; but you should start with a clear understanding of the role of the Broker. The extent of the relationship between Buyer and Broker needs to be clarified up front. In many cases, where the Buyer is fully capable of assessing the business and these other areas, the Sellers Broker alone might be sufficient. But in many transactions the Sellers Agent, is just that. Your questions might be answered but not unless you formulate them for yourself, first.

The key is to make certain you are getting what you are paying for. The Buyer is entitled to Fair Dealing practices from the Sellers Broker, but often times needed areas are neglected. It is important to have qualified representation looking after your interests. In selecting a Broker, be certain that the Broker you choose to work with has specific knowledge of the business and industry you are purchasing and your personal goals. Be certain that what you paid for is what you get.

With so much at stake; why is it, that in so many transactions the Sellers agent is the only agent? It might be due to the Selling Brokers reluctance to share their commissions. This is compounded by the Buyers reluctance to pay out additional funds for a Broker or specialist/consultant. The additional fee might seem unnecessary. To just complete a transaction, so, many Buyers rely on the Sellers Agent for assistance. This can create a misunderstanding; unless properly clarified at the beginning of the relationship.

I have personally acted as a Dual Agent in the majority of my own transactions. I believe that honest and experienced Brokers can deal in this role effectively; but, it must be understood early on. The Seller should also be aware of the Buyer/Broker relationship and understand its implications. It is additionally important that the Broker clarify the limits of the relationship and his obligation to the Buyer at the onset of the negotiations.

But once you have taken possession you are left on your own to discover the issues that were not brought into the conversation during the transaction. So start out right. You need and deserve individual attention. Be sure you get it!

About The Author:  Chuck Post specializes in assisting those selling or buyinig coin laundries throughout Southern California. He also offers other specialized services: Expert Witness Services & Coin Laundry Valuations. Make sure you check out his popular monthly workshops on the topic of buying and selling coin laundries. You can reach Chuck direct at 619-227-5711.

Watch for more blog posts / articles from me in the future!

See all contributions from Chuck Post

Share This Blog Post   |   Print This Blog Post

   Tags:


Comments:

So, in the comments are you saying that we are going too far in trying to inform and to protect buyers? It's probably a good idea to do that to protect yourself from getting sued. And have a defense if you do get sued. But you make the good point that buyers who want to buy into something they don't understand should be willing to assume the risk and face the consequences without blaming someone else for "misleading" them. Sometimes buyers make some pretty lame decisions. Like when someone is focused on something that is not important and failing to investigate the factors that really do have a lot to do with the future of the business. Who's fault is that? And what good is due diligence if the buyer isn't paying attention to the right things?

Posted by: David H.

I'm really glad to hear you say that, Ben V.T. I mean, we're always telling buyers to make sure some big competitor isn't about to move in across the street (from the business you want to buy). And we say to go over the books and records very carefully, or pay an accountant to do that, because the seller might be lying about the income and we want to catch him at it. And I think if a buyer can't figure out what to do, then that person has no business buying a business. Then if the business starts to go bad after the buyer takes over, the first thing to do is to work on building up sales and cutting expenses. But no, most buyers think the first thing to do is call the lawyer and sue the seller for misrepresentation. I think that is wrong.

Posted by: Louis Tek

Wouldn't you say a person shouldn't buy a business they don't understand? If it is a fairly simple business, like some kind of retail, and the buyer has no background in it, then that buyer should get a friend or consultant to give advice about the particulars of the business. And beyond that, the buyer should figure out the basic common sense things like whether the lease is okay, whether the competitive situation is about to change or some factor will happen that will hurt the business. If the person doesn't have the common sense to figure those things out, then get a job in a company working for someone else, and leave the business buying to people who are more resourceful and have a head for business.

Posted by: Ben V.T.

I used to think it was a good idea to help the buyer with that part. It seemed okay to do that, especially if it was an easy business to understand and something I knew about. I liked the idea of saving the buyer money and keeping the deal going forward without delays. But I have stopped that practice. Basically, it's because I don't want the liability. If a buyer hires a due diligence expert, it's a lot harder to come after me later on and claim I convinced a buyer to take over a business without that buyer having all the facts, and having the opportunity to check everything out with his own experts.

Posted by: Alex Max

I know several buyers who wanted to save some money and just did their own due diligence. Sometimes it worked out. They were lucky. Others found out after they took over that the business had problems they didn't know about. Maybe they'd still have gone ahead, had they known the information before hand. And maybe not. Or maybe they would have known enough to ask for a lower price or better terms.

Posted by: Steve C.

I look at this as insurance that you don't get into something you can't handle. Pay the money for DD and be glad you've got someone to give you outside skills and knowledge that can keep you out of financial trouble buying a bad business.

Posted by: Ron F.

Considering the buyer is about to plunk down several thousands of dollars on a business, and commit the next several years of life working in the business and depending on it to provide income, it is silly not to call in a professional to help evaluate it. You need an objective opinion. The worst thing is to "fall in love" with a business and not do the critical analysis necessary to make sure you know exactly what you are getting into. It's important to get an accountant or someone who is a due diligence expert involved when evaluating a possible acquisition.

Posted by: David H.


Submit Comment
First Name
Last Name
Company Name
Email
URL
Comment
I have read and understand the BizBen Privacy Policy